Tech Marketers: Only 1/3 of Marketers Achieve Integrated Marketing Success

October 22, 2009

Most technology marketing folks strive to plan and develop an integrated marketing approach while planning their annual strategies. The theory of IMC certainly makes sense and has proven to deliver successful results for many organizations. But achieving this integrated approach is harder than it seems. At a recent DMA conference, Dave Frankland, a senior analyst with Forrester suggested that 45 % of marketing leaders are committed to an integrated marketing approach as the core of their customer centric marketing activities, while only 1/3 of them actually deliver against this goal.

Achieving a customer-centric integrated approach to marketing has been a desire of marketers in the technology community for years.  Back in the nineties, the term integrated marketing typically described public relations, advertising, direct marketing, and promotions working together to deliver a consistent message to a target audience across multiple communications channels. With more resources, technology and tools available today, the modern definition of “fully integrated marketing” is far more expansive and emphasizes structured collaboration among most, if not all, other departments. With shared language, metrics, and strategy, the entire enterprise is able to work together toward the common goal of achieving maximum customer value from each relationship.

This new modern definition simply makes sense. Today, key trends make marketing integration a financial requirement, and the availability of technology, data, and analytic know-how has finally made establishing a customer-centric organization realistic and practical. But implementing the theory has been quite difficult for many technology organizations.

Some of the major obstacles that have prevented a customer-centric integrated approach include:
• A lack of executive support
• Organizational designs
• Compensation and incentive systems
• Measurement constraints
• Business models
• Data capture capabilities
• Analytic capabilities
• Perceived high cost
• Focus on short-term results

In a 2009 study of more than 400 CMOs and 20 business and academic leaders the CMO Council found that global marketers are seeking stable operational platforms to contend with unstable market dynamics. Their goal: “To achieve substantive performance gains that drive top-line revenues and sustainable corporate growth.”  Among the actionable key insights uncovered in the study was that inadequate data-sharing across the enterprise consistently hindered the ability to effect process and operational changes. According to the report, “Integration of platforms and processes is critical.”

As marketers, we all understand that data drives much of our activity and access to data is imperative to ensuring an integrated marketing effort drives results. These are big operational issues and should be discussed with senior leadership as you draft your strategies for 2010.

Share


Tech CMO’s trends for 2010

October 20, 2009

If you are working on developing your 2010 marketing plan, you would not be alone if you included “Attempt to forget the year 2009″ as an objective.

Within the IT world, CMOs have had a hell of a year dealing with reduced budgets, lower head count, increased scrutiny of their marketing spend and of course  a longer drawn out buying process among their targeted audiences. It simply has not been pretty and I am sure all of you are a bit exhausted. But from this year, there are opportunities in the midst and smart planning should help you drive your organization towards them.

Michael Gerard from IDG recently identified a few best practices among CMOs in tech companies as it relates to the developing your marketing plans for 2010.

  • CMOs and senior marketers need to withstand potential organization changes by making sure that they maintain reporting control and/or budget control over the entire marketing organization: the full scope of corporate marketing, product marketing, and field marketing.
  • Even as the recovery “emerges”…be prepared for further organizational changes in the marketing department. The most prevalent trend is change that will help in the unification of marketing and sales. There is opportunity in this change: marketer’s can introduce and lead significant Sales Enablement practices, for example. have in place for the up-turn to come? Are you prepared to answer this question when your boss asks you?
  • Be prepared for an economic recovery. What marketing plans and initiatives do you have in place for the up-turn to come? Are you prepared to answer this question when the CEO or CFO asks you?
  • For marketing staff positions that need to be filled or that may be the first candidates to fill when hiring freezes are lifted: there is some great marketing talent “on the street” right now and the best ones will not be there forever.
  • Every new marketing initiative that you propose should be “bundled” within a cost-savings idea. Think about re-deploying and re-directing existing budgets, versus asking for new-new monies. The IDC CMO Advisory area has many case studies for budget re-directs and re-deploys. Clients should refer to IDC Best Practice Studies on Sales Enablement, Shared Services, and Campaign Management.
  • Expand your operational proficiency for Digital Marketing. This would include a look at the sophistication of processes, infrastructure, and people. (e.g., refer to IDC’s recent telebriefing on key success factors for BtoB social media strategies)

Share


Tech marketers: 5% of marketing plans are effective

October 7, 2009

If you drive the marketing for your technology company, the most important function of your responsibility is to write the marketing plan. The resulting document is so critical to the day to day activities you and your team will pursue in the upcoming months. The truth of the matter is most of these marketing plans fall short of their expected impact for a variety of reasons.

Having trouble getting started, or perhaps you have hit the proverbial wall in the midst of formulating your plan. This problem spans industries and countries according to Tim Calkins, a Clinical Professor of Marketing at Northwestern University’s Kellogg School of Management.

Tim published a great article, based on his research, identifying the five most common pitfalls you can avoid when developing your plan.

Pitfall 1: Too Much Data

The biggest problem for many marketing plans is that there is too much data; the marketing plan is so full of facts, figures, and findings that the document gets hopelessly bogged down and the heart of the plan—the recommendations—gets lost. Unfortunately, too many marketing plans focus on the analysis and the data instead of the recommendations. The bulk of the plan is devoted to explaining what the team knows about a business.

The problem is that there is basically an infinite amount of data available today on any business. A Google search on McDonalds provides 27.9 million results. A search on Sony delivers 830 million results. Too many marketing plans focus on the data instead of the recommended plan of action. This is a huge miss.

Pitfall 2: No Clear Strategic Initiatives

A good marketing plan should be focused on presenting the objectives, the strategic initiatives needed to achieve the objectives, and the tactics associated with each of the initiatives.

In far too many marketing plans, however, the strategic initiatives are not clear. The plan either gets so bogged down in the data that the recommendations never emerge or, perhaps more frequently, the plan jumps from the data directly to the tactics. The plan presents details such as coupon values and dates before explaining why promotions are needed and how the promotion efforts fits into the big picture.

Clear strategic initiatives are essential, because a business can focus on doing only three or four things in a year. The challenge in a marketing plan is to identify these initiatives. This is where a plan creates the most value. When formulating a marketing plan, executives should always be asking “Are we focused on the right things? If we do these things, will we achieve our objectives?”

Pitfall 3: Lack of Rationale

There are two reasons for creating a marketing plan. The first is to clearly lay out the plan to build the business, and the second is to gain support. This second reason is critically important and too often overlooked. The truth is that a plan will succeed only if people believe in it.

Many people have to buy into a marketing plan before it can have an impact. Senior management needs to support the plan; without senior management support nothing will happen. Cross-functional leaders are also critical; it is almost impossible to implement a sales initiative if the sales team doesn’t think it will work. A business team also needs to support the plan; people have to believe in what they are working on. Even a great plan is doomed to failure if doesn’t have support.

Pitfall 4: No Cross-Functional Involvement

A good marketing plan cannot be written solely by the marketing team. Indeed, if the marketing team creates and writes the marketing plan on its own, there is probably a serious problem.

Marketing plans should focus on building the business; a good marketing plan has a general management perspective. As a result, the plan needs input from across the organization: the sales team, the operations group, the finance department, the customer service organization. The list goes on.

Pitfall 5: No Financials

A good marketing plan needs to be linked to the financials of a business. Indeed, the only reason any company should do any marketing is to drive sales and increase profits. As a result, a marketing plan needs to be clearly grounded in the numbers. For example, a marketing plan should almost always have a financial objective, such as revenue or, even better, profit.

Share


Tech Marketers: Why Content Marketing Fails

September 24, 2009

In technology marketing content plays a key role in all aspects of your marketing activities. If developed to be relevant to your target audience business issues, content can be used for thought leadership, credibility building, lead generation and even partner education. The key is that the content is relevant and thought through before pushing it into the market. I would also suggest that the accessibility to the content should be easy and not cause frustration.

Ardath Albee writes about some of the failures of content marketing in her Marketing Interactions blog and has identified a variety of reasons for these failures. I think the running theme here is to approach using content within your marketing efforts as you would with any other…Plan your activities. Do your homework when developing content and ensure it is relevant and current, plot our your delivery of the content and what role it will play based on vehicle and allow simple accessibility.

Here are some of the top reasons for failure as collected by Ardath Albee:

  1. Hiring an expert to develop content and then revising it to insert all those “me, me, me” terms and phrases that are noticeably absent.
  2. Only use a content resource once and then archive it somewhere offline.
  3. Not creating a content strategy BEFORE you develop content.
  4. Following up a great early-stage content offer with a pushy sales offer.
  5. Creating great content but lousy email messaging that fails to get prospects to click.
  6. Sending a great email message linked to lousy content.
  7. Not measuring response beyond opens and clicks so you have no clue which content is working, or why.
  8. When your website content is NOT in alignment with your nurturing content – hence confusing your prospects when they do click through.
  9. Landing pages that bear no resemblance to the message in your email.
  10. Promising a deep topic dive and delivering a surface skim.

You can review the full list on the link above.

Share


Online video can be effective for marketing technology

September 2, 2009

Still not sure the time and effort to produce videos as a part of your marketing mix?

Consider the results of a Marketing Sherpa report, probably the most comprehensive video marketing report released to date.  The “Marketing with Video Report: Online, TV, and Mobile.” Research presented in this report strongly suggests marketers

95% of those surveyed, who have utilized online video as a marketing tool, were satisfied with online video marketing and expect to use it in the future. This number is a resounding confirmation that on line video should be a part of your marketing mix.

sherpa-satisfaction-500x378

57% of those that were surveyed indicated that they were “Satisfied” with the performance of their video marketing efforts.  

29% responded that they were “not sure” and only a small portion of those surveyed.

9%, indicated that the results were not as positive as they had expected.

Even with some of those that were still unsure of the effectiveness, these  same respondents indicated that they would continue to utilize video marketing and felt optimistic that with a few modifications, future online video campaigns would perform better.

Only a very small percentage, 5%, said they were NOT satisfied with online video marketing.

online video marketing

Of course, this makes sense when you consider a recently released survey from PermissionTV which stated that more than 2/3rds of senior marketing and media executives identified online video as a primary focus of their 2009 digital marketing campaigns and budgets.  More than 50% stated that they plan to  launch online video projects in the first half of this year.

Bottom line, I truly believe Video can be an effective tool for tech marketers and should be considered in your planning efforts.


Share


Tech Marketers: Video continues to gain acceptance

August 27, 2009

Regulated in years past as an internal or trade show communication tool for employee meetings and larger forum presentations, the power of the video is earning a place in the marketing mix. Video gives technology companies an effective vehicle to tell their story and the ability of video to impact business objectives is the reason why it is rapidly becoming a critical component of business communications. There are some solid marketing benefits to using video:

  • Embeds your brand in significant content
  • Creates compelling and immersive experiences
  • Motivates prospects to buy
  • Communicates what makes business different
  • Demonstrates how products work
  • Educates the audience

Recently, Forbes Insights, in association with Google, announced the release of a new study today called, “The Rise of the Digital C-Suite: How Executives Locate and Filter Business Information.”  The study is of 354 C-level and top executives at major US companies with annual sales in excess of $1B and is designed to shed insight into how these executives discover and share business information.  As one would expect, the findings show that clearly the internet is the major source of information above that or network contacts, trade publications, etc…

Textual information is still king, but online video is growing in importance.

(24%) of those C-level respondents (vs. 16% non-C-suite) indicated a preference for retrieving business information via video.

online-video-source-information

The Age of the person  can also be considered

(33%) of those under the age of 50 stated that they view work-related videos daily; compared to a little more than 1/10th (11%) of those over 50 yrs.

(23%) responded that they visit YouTube daily for work-related videos while only 5% of those over 50 do.

The Bottom Line:

Video is changing the way top level executives access and share information.  This will affect purchasing decisions and audience comprehension against highly complex or even simple technology solutions.  And, as newer generations continue to move up in the business world, online video will only become more widespread as a prominent source of information.

As a tech marketer, you might want to consider using video as a key component in your marketing mix sooner rather than later.

Share


Social-Media: 70% of companies are not adequately measuring

August 20, 2009

Social media is all the rage in the marketing industry and certainly in tech marketing. But a recent MarketingProfs.com  social media study suggests that 70% of responding companies believe they are not adequately measuring their social media efforts.

social-media-measurement-adequacy-marketingprofs-august-2009

The study suggests that the biggest hurdle to social-media measurement is, apparently, finding the personnel to do the measurement and analysis: Asked to select the most-applicable measurement obstacle from several listed…

  • 30% of the respondents pointed to “dedicated resources.”
  • 25% selected “don’t know what to measure.”
  • 20% selected “social media measurement isn’t primarily about ROI.”

If your actively participating in social media, your first step should be a plan based on business objectives and criteria for how you will judge the success of these efforts.  Technology marketers have been adopting these social media approaches quickly for fear that if they don’t, they will be behind their competitors. In many cases these quick to react scenarios leave little time for properly setting up the approach.

Can you imagine if you were to go to market with an extensive lead generation direct mail or email campaign that has no back end metrics planned, how does a marketing group justify the expense when questioned?

No soap box here, but a word of advice. As you would plan and execute any other media effort, apply the same planning and metrics to social media. The social media option can play an effective role in your marketing mix, if you measure the activity and adjust accordingly.

Share


Technology marketing starts with the lead

August 18, 2009

This has been the year of lead generation for many technology companies and rightly so. Marketing departments and their related activities are under scrutiny for true ROI and properly measuring leads will tell your story. But with the focus on generating leads whether on line or off line, many organizations are not planning the follow up activities. And many can argue that this is where marketing can add the greatest value.

Selling cycles for technology solutions are longer than most B2B sales and require a smart nurturing strategy to move those opt ins and response calls towards a true sales conversion. Ardath Albee  writes in her Marketing Interactions blog that:

78% of marketers say they need to improve the quality of leads they send to sales (Aberdeen), she also quotes a recent 2009 Sales Performance Optimization Study by CSO Insights and found that, “59% of companies with sales cycles longer than 4 months said their ability to qualify and prioritize which leads to pursue needed improvement.”

These numbers identify the need for a smart nurturing program as tech buyers are extending their decisions and investigating potential solutions more in-depth. Since most time lines for a decision are controlled by the buyers, tech marketers need to use the window of time between signs of initial interest (opt ins, response phone calls, even initial presentations) and final decisions to build and deliver relevant communications to those in the pipeline.

As Ardath points out, your content needs to be refreshed at bare minimum three times. That means you should plan your message strategy for follow up and pitch the value your solutions will bring to the buyer using different selling point, while communication the overall point of difference. Your message should be written to address their business issues and not necessarily yours!

The point is that generating leads is where marketing starts and marketing should start with planning its nurturing efforts.

Share


Marketing to technology buyers with well planned search engine marketing

August 11, 2009

As a tech marketer your activities must include some search engine marketing.

A large variety of industry data suggests that more than 8o percent of all initial Web site or blog visits are generated from search engines. It is also well documented that tech buyers begin their exploratory phase for new purchases searching on line.thumbnail

If you are not familiar, there are two tactical approaches to search:

organic search: which relies on unpaid search listings

paid search: paid inclusion and pay-per-click ad listings

Truth be told, as a technology marketer, you should be using both. Ranking high in organic search results for a relevant and popular key phrase complimented by smart content and well-planned placements from a paid search campaign can create short and long term value. This of course, is the ultimate scenario towards credibility and market leadership with the tech buyer.

Of course, realistically, budgets and business objectives make this dual scenario hard to justify, so its best to understand how paid and organic search can be effectively implemented to accomplish different situations.

Short term or immediate goals like lead generation can effectively rely on Paid search as it is effective for getting your message in front of tech buyers who are further in their buying cycle and ready to act. Studies have found that paid search can generate more click-through when the call to action is an immediate transaction.

Since paid search guarantees top placement based on your media buy, your message will be in front of searchers quickly. If you have a message that requires an immediate action or transaction, paid search is a good option. Of course the flexibility of paid search allows you adapt messaging based on results.

If you are marketing a tech solution that requires more consideration, organic search can be more effective.  Most tech buyers will initiate an exploratory phase that will gather information over a long period of time. Organic search  results, like high page rankings, increase the buyer confidence that the information is trustworthy. This can establish better credibility

Have the right expectation with organic search efforts.  Results ranking relates directly to the indexed relevance of your triggering search terms. So it can take months to gain traction. This slow reaction time requires that you develop your search strategy well in advance of any goals you are trying to achieve, which also allows for a minimum of flexibility in your program.

What is the bottom line? Paid search is the place to focus if you have immediate search goals or a desired behavior that involves an immediate, single-step action. Paid search is also the path to consider if you need a program flexible enough to react to quick-changing market conditions.

Organic search is the strategy if you are supporting a multi-step or multi-person considered purchase that will stay largely the same for a long time. Organic search restricts flexibility but enhances results by increasing prospect confidence.

Each type of search program has specific strengths and weaknesses. Most marketing communication programs have goals that call on the strengths of both tactics. Therefore, the question should not be “Which of the two should be chosen?” but “How much of each one will be needed?” to achieve your marketing goals.


Share


Technology-Buyer: Sources and Strategies for Ordering Lists

July 23, 2009

With lead generation being a priority at many technology organizations, I thought I would share some resources that can be considered when trying to identify and develop a direct response list against the tech buyers.

As many of you know, developing a target list is always a challenge as the data and selects available are always under scrutiny in regards to their quality and accuracy. Having said, that, I do believe there are some solid resources to start the process of your list development.thumbnail

As Lisa Bowen suggests at Prospectstogo there is a large quantity of data around the tech buyer audience. Certainly we know that tech buyers are on line and exploring various information portals as they gather more information during their exploratory phase. Of course, many of these folks fill out the forms and some are quite detailed. Names, contact information, platforms and in some cases hardware and software can be identified.

Here are three established data sources you can start to pull your list from:

TechTarget e-mail list

IT Management and Staff Database

Computerworld

You can also lean on technology-oriented databases accessible by on line subscriptions as well as one-time download options from CorpTech and Harte-Hanks.  Dun & Bradstreet, at its ZapData.com site.

For the most part, you can find detailed selects in each of these data sources, they are all organized differently, but this gives you an idea of the information available:

  • Number of Employees
  • Fortune 1000 Identifier
  • Job Title and Job Function
  • Industry
  • Operating System
  • Annual Budget for Information Services
  • Software/Services Purchasing Involvement
  • Hardware Purchasing Involvement, and
  • IT Functions or Services Currently Outsourced or Plan to Outsource Within the Next 12 Months

I am a strong believer in buying lists from these sources identified, but I am a stronger believer in spending a few dollars upfront and performing List verification. The amount of time or money spent calling and verifying this information will save your organization money in the long run, and increase the potential effectiveness of your direct response effort.

Lisa provided a few tips you can plan to use before you start your list development process. Using these tips upfront may ensure more accuracy of your desired list.

  • Give your list broker your Google Adwords keyword list. If you don’t have one, write down words that describe both your product and the need it serves.  Ask your list broker to research postal, telemarketing and e-mail lists that highlight the keywords as selections you can order.
  • Test a segment of all names from these keywords against the demographic selects you typically request (commonly job title).
  • Test e-newsletter sponsorships as an alternative to e-mail list rental. Each technology magazine and its associated website offers a series of e-newsletters.  The e-newsletters are segmented by area of interest only (no demographic sorting is available), but they’re tremendously less expensive per name as a result.  You pay a flat fee for a blast to the entire e-newsletter subscription list, rather than paying a cost-per-thousand (with a 5,000-name minimum order) for one-time list rental.

Good Luck!

Share


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.