<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tech Marketers: Is Your Revenue Pipeline Idle?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techmarketingblog.com/2009/02/22/is-your-revenue-pipeline-idle/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techmarketingblog.com/2009/02/22/is-your-revenue-pipeline-idle/</link>
	<description>Resources for B to B Technology Marketing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 05:58:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Melissa Paulik</title>
		<link>http://techmarketingblog.com/2009/02/22/is-your-revenue-pipeline-idle/#comment-156</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Melissa Paulik]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 18:19:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jacobsagency.wordpress.com/?p=84#comment-156</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ll second the vote for #4.1. Sales and marketing should get together regularly to review the leads that have been handed over or kept for nurturing. I find that sales may have an &quot;in&quot; with a company that we wanted to nurture and just knowing there was an inquiry gives them good intel.

In addition, you&#039;ll uncover situations where sales or marketing isn&#039;t living up to the SLA. Either marketing is tossing unqualified leads over the fence or sales has dropped the ball on follow up. Or sometimes its simply a matter of some tweaking that needs to be done with the scoring threshold in order to set a better definition of &quot;qualified.&quot;

All the best!

Melissa]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll second the vote for #4.1. Sales and marketing should get together regularly to review the leads that have been handed over or kept for nurturing. I find that sales may have an &#8220;in&#8221; with a company that we wanted to nurture and just knowing there was an inquiry gives them good intel.</p>
<p>In addition, you&#8217;ll uncover situations where sales or marketing isn&#8217;t living up to the SLA. Either marketing is tossing unqualified leads over the fence or sales has dropped the ball on follow up. Or sometimes its simply a matter of some tweaking that needs to be done with the scoring threshold in order to set a better definition of &#8220;qualified.&#8221;</p>
<p>All the best!</p>
<p>Melissa</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce Colwin</title>
		<link>http://techmarketingblog.com/2009/02/22/is-your-revenue-pipeline-idle/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bruce Colwin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 16:07:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jacobsagency.wordpress.com/?p=84#comment-22</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great suggestion for increasing sales and improving effectiveness of marketing/leadgen programs.  I think the feedback loop is essential and items like 1.4 are often overlooked.  Thanks.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great suggestion for increasing sales and improving effectiveness of marketing/leadgen programs.  I think the feedback loop is essential and items like 1.4 are often overlooked.  Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

